Contact Us

If you have a question about Texas inheritance laws, contact us.Click here to go to the contact form if you want to contact us about an inheritance dispute.

YOUR PRIVACY.

YOUR PRIVACY IS IMPORTANT TO US.

We take your privacy very seriously. We are keenly aware of the trust you place in us and our responsibility to protect your privacy. We treat all information provided to us with care and discretion.

Visit Our Blog

Visit our blog to get up to the minute inheritance information Click this icon to visit our blog. We post new cases and other information dealing with inheritance disputes on our blog.

Use the Search Box

Looking for specific topics and not seeing them? Use the search box at the very top to find what you are looking for.

Examples might be "community property" or "Divorce" or "Intestate."

Robert Ray is Board Certified


Board Certified, Personal Injury Trial Law — Texas Board of Legal Specialization.

Our principal office is in Tyler, Texas.

Tell Us How to Improve

Our Site Should Have More About:
 

Who's Online

We have 6 guests online
Read About Unfair Wills and Texas Probate - Grounds for Contesting Bad Wills
Information About Inheritance Laws

Wills being signed The information is based on Texas Inheritance laws.



 
Information About Inheritance Laws

Wills being signed You may find the answer to your question about those topics on the pages of this site. Browse around to see if your question is answered.



 
Learn about Revoking a Will

There are two ways to revoke a will: by subsequent testamentary instrument or by physical act. The Texas probate code, section 63, specifies these two exclusive ways that a will can be revoked. Section 63 says:

"No will in writing, and no clause thereof or devise therein, shall be revoked, except by a subsequent will, codicil, or declaration in writing, executed with like formalities, or by the testator destroying or canceling the same, or causing it to be done in his presence."


Subsequent Testamentary Instrument: To revoke a will by subsequent testamentary instrument, the testator must have testamentary capacity. If he does not have testamentary capacity, the attempted revocation by a subsequent will is ineffective. If the subsequent will is not admitted to probate for some reason, i. e., the will was denied probate because it was the result of undue influence for example, it is void in toto, every provision of it, and it cannot serve to revoke a former will. 761 S.W.2d 448. The testamentary instrument used to revoke a will, does not have to be a will itself. As long as it is in writing and executed with the same formalities of a will, a paper saying as little as "I revoke my will" is sufficient to revoke a prior will.

Since revocation by implication is not favored, if the testator has a will and then executes a subsequent will that does not specifically say he is revoking the first will, the two wills will be read together as much as possible and the second testamentary instrument will be treated as a codicil to the first will.

Revival of revoked wills: when a testator executes a will and then subsequently executes a second will revoking the first will and then later on decides that he wants the first will to be his will, merely destroying the second will will not revive the first will. In order to revive the first will, the testator must re-executed with the formalities required by law.

Physical Act: The physical act of revocation by destroying the will must be the destruction of the will itself. The intent to destroy without actually destroying the will is insufficient. In one case, the testator tore up an envelope which he thought contained the will. It did not contain the will and the court held that his intention to destroy it without actually destroying it did not revoke the will.

The physical destruction must be of the entire will. A testator cannot destroy a sentence or a paragraph in a will such as scratching through them. The strikeout will be ignored by the courts.

There are some statutes that revoke portions of the will without any action by the testator. For instance, if a testator makes a will and then later divorces his wife who was named in the will, all provisions in his will in favor of the wife are void. Likewise, if the testator executes a will and then later as a child who is not mentioned in the will or otherwise provided for, the law will allow the child to take a portion of the testator's estate.

 
Learn About Contesting a Will Because of Lack of Testamentary Capacity

Contesting a will because of lack of testamentary capacityTo make a will so that the inheritance rights of loved ones are protected, a testator has to have testamentary capacity. To have "testamentary capacity" the testator must, at the time of the execution of the will, have sufficient mental ability

  1. to understand the business in which he is engaged;
  2. to understand the effect of his act in making the will;...
  3. to know the general nature and extent of his property;
  4. to recognize his next of kin and the natural objects of his bounty; and
  5. have sufficient memory to collect in his mind the elements of the business to be transacted and to hold them long enough to perceive at least their obvious relation to each other and to form a reasonable judgment.
Read more about contesting a will because of lack of testamentary Capacity
 
Can You Have an Oral Will?

Nuncupative or oral willTexas requires that all wills be in writing. Before 2007, however, Texas recognized nuncupative or oral wills. Now, oral wills or no longer recognized.

Before 2007 when oral wills were admitted to probate, you could only dispose of personal property by an oral will, not real property. Because oral wills were subject to abuse in that anyone could claim that the Testator told them who they wanted to have the estate, oral wills had to meet certain criteria.The will had to be:

1. Made when the Testator was in his last sickness;
2. Made at the testator's home or where he had resided for more than 10 days; and,
3. The amount subject to the will could be no more than $30.00 dollars " unless it be proved by three credible witnesses that the Testator called on a person to take notice or bear testimony that such is his will, or words of like import."

Nuncupative wills are an historical oddity that estate attorneys talk about when discussing the "good old days."

 
Read About Contesting a Will Because of Fraud in the Inducement

Fraud can be a reason to contest a will"Fraud in the Inducement" occurs when a fact “outside of the document” is intentionally misrepresented and, without such misrepresentation, the testator would not ave executed will. In Texas, fraud in the inducement of a dispositive instrument and undue influence are treated as one.

Fraud in the inducement can include promissory misrepresentation as well as isrepresentation of an existing fact.

If you have questions about your inheritance rights and would like to talk to an estate planning attorney or a lawyer who is familiar with inheritance and probate law to advise you about your inheritance rights, click on the "Contact Us" tab at the top.

 
Read About Contesting a Will Because of an Insane Delusion

What is an insane delusion?A claim of “insane delusion” resembles a claim of lack of testamentary capacity and is sometimes considered to be a sub-category of testamentary capacity. An “insane delusion” is the belief of supposed facts that do not exist, and

  1. which no rational person would believe.

The courts have held that a testatrix’s conviction that one or both of her disinherited children were...

Read more about contesting a will because of an Insane Delusion
 
Learn About Contesting a Will Because of Undue Influence

Contesting a will because of undue influenceThe inheritance rights of loved ones are defeated if the testator is under the undue influence of another. To set aside a will on the basis of a claim of undue influence the contestant must prove

  1. the existence and exercise of an influence upon the testator,
  2. which operated to subvert or overpower the testator’s mind at the time the will was executed, and...
  3. such that the execution would not have occurred but for the undue influence.


Read more about contesting a will because of undue influence
 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 Next > End >>

Page 1 of 2

Disclaimer

This site does not give legal advice. This site does not create an attorney client relationship.

The use of the Internet, this site or email for communication with this firm or any individual member of this firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Before we represent any client, the client and the attorney will sign a written retainer agreement. If you do not have a written, signed retainer agreement with us, we are not representing you and will not be taking any action on your behalf.